Leading Estate Agents of the World Logo

Upfront Property Information Is Coming

The government wants buyers to receive far more property information before committing time and money to a purchase. The reforms are not all in force yet, but buyers can already adopt the principle behind them.
The government's June 2026 homebuying and selling reform roadmap starts with a striking diagnosis. It says transactions currently take an average of 120 days from accepted offer to completion and around one in three fail. One of the problems identified is that important information can emerge only after buyers have spent money and become emotionally committed to a purchase. The proposed response includes more standardised information at the start of a sale.

The roadmap discusses potential sales-pack information covering matters such as tenure, council tax band, Energy Performance Certificate rating, title information, leasehold terms, building-safety information, searches, flood risk, planning matters and property condition. That direction could materially change the experience of buying a home but an important distinction is necessary: the roadmap sets out reforms the government intends to pursue. It does not mean every property currently on the market in September 2026 already comes with a complete mandatory sales pack containing all of those items.

Buyers do not need to wait to ask better questions

The underlying principle is useful immediately: information that could materially change your decision is most valuable before you have invested heavily in the transaction. For a leasehold flat, that might include remaining lease length, service charges, planned major works and relevant building-safety information. For a house, it could include previous extensions, planning permissions, known flooding, boundaries, access arrangements or the age of major alterations.

Chain status matters too. A seller who still needs to find an onward purchase creates a different timetable and risk profile from a chain-free seller. Not every answer will be available at the viewing stage, and some require legal or specialist verification. The point is to identify the important unknowns early.

Upfront information does not replace due diligence

More information in a listing should not be confused with a survey, conveyancing or mortgage valuation. Government guidance states that a lender will normally undertake a valuation before approving a mortgage. That valuation is for lending purposes. Buyers can separately commission a survey to investigate the physical condition of the property. RICS provides three levels of Home Survey, with the appropriate choice depending on factors such as the property's age, condition, construction and complexity. Nor is an accepted offer the end of the decision-making process in England and Wales. An offer is generally not legally binding until contracts are exchanged. Those distinctions matter when a survey, search or legal investigation uncovers something unexpected.

The most useful approach is not to ask every possible question about every home. It is to identify the risks associated with the particular property. A converted period flat may warrant close attention to lease terms, service charges and alterations. A rural house can bring questions about drainage, private roads, rights of way or boundaries. A recently extended property raises different questions around planning and building-control documentation. Buyers should also distinguish between information supplied by the seller or agent and information independently verified by a solicitor, surveyor or other specialist.

The direction of government policy is towards earlier disclosure and a more digital buying process. If successfully implemented, that could reduce the number of unwelcome discoveries occurring late in transactions. Buyers do not need to wait for every reform to arrive, however. Asking better questions earlier will not eliminate all uncertainty, but it can reveal which uncertainties deserve investigation before further money and time are committed.